Is it just me, or does anybody else find themselves getting frustrated by trying to play an objective game on their own ?
If i just join a random game, i seem to end up with a "team" of players who are more interested in their K:D ratio, than completing the objectives. I've lost Headquarters games 250-0 because nobody was interested in playing the objective and instead just went chasing kills.
I applaud Treyarch for removing MW2s care package stacking, meaning you could rack up a 25 kill streak having only made maybe 5 or 6 gun kills.
But it still seems that people who play the game for K:D ratio are not getting the message clearly enough that objective based games like Domination and Headquarters are not the game for them despite the adscence of the K:D ratio on screen.
Which leads me to pose the question, do we need to increase the scoring for completing an objective, or possibly even reducing the point count for kills in objective based game modes ??
I'd be interested in knowing if anybody else finds this, and what measures they feel could be taken.
If i just join a random game, i seem to end up with a "team" of players who are more interested in their K:D ratio, than completing the objectives. I've lost Headquarters games 250-0 because nobody was interested in playing the objective and instead just went chasing kills.
I applaud Treyarch for removing MW2s care package stacking, meaning you could rack up a 25 kill streak having only made maybe 5 or 6 gun kills.
But it still seems that people who play the game for K:D ratio are not getting the message clearly enough that objective based games like Domination and Headquarters are not the game for them despite the adscence of the K:D ratio on screen.
Which leads me to pose the question, do we need to increase the scoring for completing an objective, or possibly even reducing the point count for kills in objective based game modes ??
I'd be interested in knowing if anybody else finds this, and what measures they feel could be taken.